Greer believes that since rape is not a “spectacularly violent crime”, punishment for offenders should be reduced. |
“Society
should not see it as a “spectacularly violent crime”
but
instead view it more as “lazy, careless and insensitive”.
A feminist academic, Germaine
Greer, has called for the reduction of punishment for rape offenders,
suggesting that society should not see it as a “spectacularly violent crime”
but instead view it more as “lazy, careless and insensitive”.
The Guardian reports that Greer suggested instead a fitting sentence for the offence might be 200 hours’ community service and perhaps an “r” tattoo on the rapist’s hand, arm or cheek.
The Guardian reports that Greer suggested instead a fitting sentence for the offence might be 200 hours’ community service and perhaps an “r” tattoo on the rapist’s hand, arm or cheek.
Speaking at the Hay
literary festival, the feminist academic argued that rape is rampant in society
and the legal system cannot cope with it because it always comes down to the
issue of consent, with the victims becoming little more than “bits of
evidence”.
She said the system was
not working and radical change was needed. “I want to turn the discourse about
rape upside down. We are not getting anywhere approaching it down the tunnel of
history,” she said.
“Most rapes don’t involve
any injury whatsoever,” Greer said. “We are told that it is a sexually violent
crime, an expert like Quentin Tarantino will tell us that when you
use the word rape you’re talking about violence, a throwing them down... it is
one of the most violent crimes in the world. Bullshit Tarantino.
“Most rape is just lazy,
just careless, and insensitive. Every time a man rolls over on his exhausted
wife and insists on enjoying his conjugal rights he is raping her. It will
never end up in a court of law.
“Instead of thinking of
rape as a spectacularly violent crime, and some rapes are, think about it as
non consensual … that is bad sex. Sex where there is no communication, no
tenderness, no mention of love.”
Rape trials were
foundering and not ending in convictions as lawyers argued over the issue of
consent, she said. Why not believe the woman and lower the penalty?
“If we are going to say
trust us, believe us, if we do say that our accusation should stand as
evidence, then we do have to reduce the tariff for rape.”
Greer acknowledged her
thesis would be controversial. “It is moments like these, I can hear the
feminists screaming at me, ‘you’re trivialising rape!’
“Well I’ll tell you what …
You might want to believe that the penis is a lethal weapon and that all women
live in fear of that lethal weapon, well that’s bullshit. It’s not true. We
don’t live in terror of the penis … A man can’t kill you with his penis.”
You May Also Like: STOP SLEEPING WITH YOUR HUSBAND TO QUALIFY FOR HOLY COMMUNION, CHURCH TELLS WOMAN
She said that, in cases of
obviously violent rape, the courts should concentrate on the violence which
should attract bigger sentences, rather than having long trials in which women
are humiliated for long periods.
Greer is publishing her
full argument on rape in a new book, coming out in Australia in September.
She said some might see
her attitude to rape as flippant, but she reminded the silent Hay audience of
her own experience when she was 18 and was raped. She was beaten repeatedly by
a man telling her “say fuck me” a dozen times. Did she say it? “I don’t think I
did, but maybe I did. How would that look on my mobile phone in court saying
‘fuck me’?” Greer did not make a complaint to police.
She questioned a statistic
which said that 70% of rape victims had suffered post-traumatic stress disorder
compared with 20% of conflict veterans.
“What the hell are you
saying? Something that leaves no sign, no injury, no nothing is more damaging
to a woman than seeing your best friend blown up by an IED is to a veteran?”
Society wanted women to
believe that rape destroyed them, she said. “We haven’t been destroyed, we’ve
been bloody annoyed is what we’ve been.”
Greer has long divided
opinion, since she published her landmark work The Female Eunuch in 1970, and her Hay talk shows no sign of
changing that.
She said the world was
full of bad sex, that people were not talking and loving as they should.
“Love-making is not a matter of an organ, it is a matter of communication and
somehow we’ve got to rescue it. It is in deep trouble, heterosex.”
It is more of a crisis for
women, she added. “Women love men, more than they [men] love women. We are more
aware of our men, more than they are aware of us. We are more easily pressured
into pleasing them, or trying to please them. We tend to love our sons more
than our daughters, we hope it doesn’t show, but it nearly always does.”
Greer was pessimistic
about the Harvey Weinstein case, predicting that the only winners would be
lawyers. “They will break down the witness,” she said.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Disclaimer: Comments from our readers do not represent the editorial policy of The Bulletin Press.